Harris v. City of Tuscaloosa
110 So. 920, 21 Ala. App. 674
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. City of Tuscaloosa. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 374 →
Opinion
The appellant, John Harris, was tried and convicted of violating the prohibition laws of the city of Tuscaloosa, and from the judgment of conviction in the circuit court he appealed. The cause is here submitted upon motion of appellee to affirm. No assignment of error has been made, and no brief of appellant filed, as the law requires. The motion to affirm is therefore granted. Martin v. City of Birmingham, 19 Ala. App. 70, 94 So. 789, and cased cited. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. City of Tuscaloosa, 110 So. 920, 21 Ala. App. 674 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
110 So. 920 (Harris v. City of Tuscaloosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. City of Birmingham
94 So. 789 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)