Harris v. City of New York
811 N.E.2d 35, 2 N.Y.3d 758, 2 N.Y. 758, 778 N.Y.S.2d 773, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 654
This text of 811 N.E.2d 35 (Harris v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. City of New York, 811 N.E.2d 35, 2 N.Y.3d 758, 2 N.Y. 758, 778 N.Y.S.2d 773, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 654 (N.Y. 2004).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant, having stipulated to a reduction in damages at the Appellate Division, is not a party aggrieved (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777, 780 n [leave dismissed]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Whitfield v. City of New York
689 N.E.2d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
811 N.E.2d 35, 2 N.Y.3d 758, 2 N.Y. 758, 778 N.Y.S.2d 773, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-city-of-new-york-ny-2004.