Harris v. City of New York
811 N.E.2d 35, 2 N.Y.3d 758, 2 N.Y. 758, 778 N.Y.S.2d 773, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 654
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant, having stipulated to a reduction in damages at the Appellate Division, is not a party aggrieved (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777, 780 n [leave dismissed]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. City of New York, 811 N.E.2d 35, 2 N.Y.3d 758, 2 N.Y. 758, 778 N.Y.S.2d 773, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 654 (N.Y. 2004).
811 N.E.2d 35 (Harris v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitfield v. City of New York
689 N.E.2d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)