Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Harris v. Cates

Harris v. Cates

126 S.E.2d 244, 105 Ga. App. 866, 1962 Ga. App. LEXIS 1066
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. Cates. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 Ga. App. 178 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 9, 1962·No. 39163·Published

Opinion

Per Cxjriam.

The judgment of this court in Harris v. Cates, 105 Ga. App. 178 (123 SE2d 703) having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia in Cates v. Harris, 217 Ga. 801 (125 SE2d 649), the judgment of this court is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

[867] Decided May 9, 1962. B. Hugh Burgess, Edward E. Dorsey, C. B. Rogers, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Hyatt, contra.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Felton, C. J., Bell and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Cates, 126 S.E.2d 244, 105 Ga. App. 866, 1962 Ga. App. LEXIS 1066 (Ga. Ct. App. 1962).

126 S.E.2d 244 (Harris v. Cates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cates v. Harris
125 S.E.2d 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Harris v. Cates
123 S.E.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)