Harris v. Briley

94 S.E.2d 476, 244 N.C. 526, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 448
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 26, 1956·No. 91·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application of the statute to the factual situation here stipulated has heretofore been carefully considered and determined adversely to the claims of defendant. Allen v. Allen, 209 N.C. 744, 184 S.E. 485. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Johnson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Briley, 94 S.E.2d 476, 244 N.C. 526, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 448 (N.C. 1956).

94 S.E.2d 476 (Harris v. Briley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Russell
720 S.E.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Patterson v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A.
315 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Kirkpatrick v. Sanders
261 F.2d 480 (Fourth Circuit, 1958)