Harris v. Briley

94 S.E.2d 476, 244 N.C. 526, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 448
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 26, 1956
Docket91
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 94 S.E.2d 476 (Harris v. Briley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Briley, 94 S.E.2d 476, 244 N.C. 526, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 448 (N.C. 1956).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application of the statute to the factual situation here stipulated has heretofore been carefully considered and determined adversely to the claims of defendant. Allen v. Allen, 209 N.C. 744, 184 S.E. 485. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Johnson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Russell
720 S.E.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Patterson v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A.
315 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Kirkpatrick v. Sanders
261 F.2d 480 (Fourth Circuit, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E.2d 476, 244 N.C. 526, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-briley-nc-1956.