Harris v. BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION
741 N.W.2d 316
This text of 741 N.W.2d 316 (Harris v. BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION, 741 N.W.2d 316 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Virginia HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION, d/b/a Botsford Continuing Health Center, Defendant/Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Starmed Health Personnel, Inc., d/b/a Starmed Staffing Group, and Kathleen Holmes, LPN, Third-Party Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. CATHRON
741 N.W.2d 316 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
741 N.W.2d 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-botsford-continuing-care-corporation-mich-2007.