Harris v. BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION
741 N.W.2d 316
Opinion
Virginia HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION, d/b/a Botsford Continuing Health Center, Defendant/Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Starmed Health Personnel, Inc., d/b/a Starmed Staffing Group, and Kathleen Holmes, LPN, Third-Party Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION, 741 N.W.2d 316 (Mich. 2007).
741 N.W.2d 316 (Harris v. BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. CATHRON
741 N.W.2d 316 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)