Harris v. Ann's House of Nuts (Flagstone Foods)

640 F. App'x 256
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2016
DocketNo. 15-1846
StatusPublished

This text of 640 F. App'x 256 (Harris v. Ann's House of Nuts (Flagstone Foods)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Ann's House of Nuts (Flagstone Foods), 640 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rander H. Harris appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Ann’s House of Nuts, Inc., No. 4:14-ev-00185-F, 2015 WL 3902017 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
640 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-anns-house-of-nuts-flagstone-foods-ca4-2016.