Harris v. Ann's House of Nuts (Flagstone Foods)

Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Ann's House of Nuts (Flagstone Foods)

640 F. App'x 256

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2016·No. No. 15-1846·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rander H. Harris appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Ann’s House of Nuts, Inc., No. 4:14-ev-00185-F, 2015 WL 3902017 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rander H. Harris appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Ann’s House of Nuts, Inc., No. 4:14-ev-00185-F, 2015 WL 3902017 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Harris v. Ann's House of Nuts (Flagstone Foods), 640 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

640 F. App'x 256 (Harris v. Ann's House of Nuts (Flagstone Foods)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.