Harris v. Andrews

Fourth Circuit

Harris v. Andrews

607 F. App'x 327

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2015·No. No. 15-6165·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Harris, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Harris leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Andrews, No. 5:14-hc-02061-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Harris, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Harris leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Andrews, No. 5:14-hc-02061-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Harris v. Andrews, 607 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

607 F. App'x 327 (Harris v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related