Harris v. Anderson
This text of 99 S.E. 530 (Harris v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. On the trial of a statutory claim to land under the Civil Code, § 5157, interposed to resist the levy of a fi. fa. based on a money judgment, the claimant may support his claim by proof of a perfect equity in the land. Grace v. Means, 129 Ga. 638, 641 (59 S. E. 811); Wheeler v. Martin, 145 Ga. 164 (88 S. E. 951), and cases there cited.
2. In such a case it is not necessary for the claimant to file special equitable pleadings supplementary to his statutory claim, in order that ha may introduce evidence of his equitable title to the land. Askew v. Amos, 147 Ga. 613 (95 S. E. 5).
3. Under application of the foregoing principles it was erroneous to exclude from evidence testimony of the claimant to the effect that she had purchased and paid for the land. This error affected the charge to the jury, wherein the claimant’s right to a favorable verdict was restricted to bare possession of the land.
4. Other assignments of error show no cause for reversal, nor are they of such character as to require elaboration.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 S.E. 530, 149 Ga. 168, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-anderson-ga-1919.