Harris v. American Red Cross Blood Services

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harris v. American Red Cross Blood Services

393 S.W.3d 619, 2013 WL 978710, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 311

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 12, 2013·No. No. ED 98330·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Harris (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) that affirmed a denial of unemployment benefits by the Appeals Tribunal because Claimant was discharged from American Red Cross Blood Services (“Employer”) for misconduct connected with work. We have reviewed the briefs [620] of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Harris (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) that affirmed a denial of unemployment benefits by the Appeals Tribunal because Claimant was discharged from American Red Cross Blood Services (“Employer”) for misconduct connected with work. We have reviewed the briefs [620] of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Harris v. American Red Cross Blood Services, 393 S.W.3d 619, 2013 WL 978710, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 311 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

393 S.W.3d 619 (Harris v. American Red Cross Blood Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.