Harris v. Akpore

Seventh Circuit

Harris v. Akpore

529 F. App'x 794

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 9, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1018

StatusPublished

This text of 529 F. App'x 794 (Harris v. Akpore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Akpore, 529 F. App'x 794 (7th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This court entered an order vacating oral argument in this case and requesting from the parties memoranda regarding the effect on this ease of the court’s decision in Villanueva v. Anglin, 719 F.3d 769 (7th Cir.2013). After reviewing the memoranda, we conclude that the two cases are materially indistinguishable. Therefore, based on the analysis in Villanueva, the district court’s judgment denying Harris’s request for a writ of habeas corpus is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This court entered an order vacating oral argument in this case and requesting from the parties memoranda regarding the effect on this ease of the court’s decision in Villanueva v. Anglin, 719 F.3d 769 (7th Cir.2013). After reviewing the memoranda, we conclude that the two cases are materially indistinguishable. Therefore, based on the analysis in Villanueva, the district court’s judgment denying Harris’s request for a writ of habeas corpus is

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

529 F. App'x 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-akpore-ca7-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack