Harris v. Adams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7963
JAMES C. HARRIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 07-6468
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00057-HEH)
Submitted: May 10, 2007 Decided: May 14, 2007 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James C. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, James C. Harris, a federal
prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motion for reconsideration. Harris also appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for release. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Adams, No.
3:06-cv-00057-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2006; Jan. 16, 2007; Mar. 23,
2007). We deny Harris’s motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. Adams (Harris v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.