Harris v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 14, 2007·No. 06-7963·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7963

JAMES C. HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 07-6468

Plaintiff - Appellant,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00057-HEH)

Submitted: May 10, 2007 Decided: May 14, 2007 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, James C. Harris, a federal

prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e) motion for reconsideration. Harris also appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion for release. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Adams, No.

3:06-cv-00057-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2006; Jan. 16, 2007; Mar. 23,

2007). We deny Harris’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Adams, (4th Cir. 2007).

Harris v. Adams (Harris v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241