Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State

474 P.3d 835
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 23, 2020·No. 81898·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TIYACTE REGENE HARRIS, No. 81898 Appellant,

vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. OCT 2 3 2020

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and for leave to supplement petition and denying as moot a "motion for post-conviction relief." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and for leave to supplement petition and an order denying as rnoot a "motion for post-conviction relief." Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Parraguir

Cadish

Gir4) J.

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Tiyacte Regene Harris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 to) l947A cgSAID

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State, 474 P.3d 835 (Neb. 2020).

474 P.3d 835 (Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)