Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State

474 P.3d 835
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 23, 2020
Docket81898
StatusPublished

This text of 474 P.3d 835 (Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State, 474 P.3d 835 (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TIYACTE REGENE HARRIS, No. 81898 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. OCT 2 3 2020

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and for leave to supplement petition and denying as moot a "motion for post-conviction relief." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and for leave to supplement petition and an order denying as rnoot a "motion for post-conviction relief." Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J. Parraguir

Cadish Gir4) J. cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Tiyacte Regene Harris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 to) l947A cgSAID

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 P.3d 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-tiyacte-vs-state-nev-2020.