Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State
This text of 474 P.3d 835 (Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TIYACTE REGENE HARRIS, No. 81898 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. OCT 2 3 2020
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and for leave to supplement petition and denying as moot a "motion for post-conviction relief." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and for leave to supplement petition and an order denying as rnoot a "motion for post-conviction relief." Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Parraguir
Cadish Gir4) J. cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Tiyacte Regene Harris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 to) l947A cgSAID
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 P.3d 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-tiyacte-vs-state-nev-2020.