Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TIYACTE REGENE HARRIS, No. 81898 Appellant,
vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. OCT 2 3 2020
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and for leave to supplement petition and denying as moot a "motion for post-conviction relief." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and for leave to supplement petition and an order denying as rnoot a "motion for post-conviction relief." Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
Parraguir
Cadish
Gir4) J.
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Tiyacte Regene Harris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 to) l947A cgSAID
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
474 P.3d 835 (Harris (Tiyacte) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.