Harris, Shoshawnee Warr

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 31, 2021
DocketWR-92,409-01
StatusPublished

This text of Harris, Shoshawnee Warr (Harris, Shoshawnee Warr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris, Shoshawnee Warr, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,409-01

EX PARTE SHOSHAWNEE WARR HARRIS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR-09-7980A IN THE DISTRICT COURT FROM SAN AUGUSTINE COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant pled guilty to murder under a plea agreement for a forty-year prison sentence.

Applicant, through habeas counsel, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county

of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07.

Applicant alleges his guilty plea was involuntary because trial counsel misinformed him

about parole eligibility. See Ex Parte Moussazadeh, 361 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).

Applicant says, “Trial counsel told me that I would be eligible for parole before I had done half of

my time day-for-day. [Counsel] got the deadly weapon finding removed from my conviction, telling

me that this would make my case no longer a Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12 §3g case. This 2

caused me to agree to the plea bargain in my case.” See Tex. Gov’ t Code 508.145.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Accordingly, the record

should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM .

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In

developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding whether counsel

misadvised Applicant about parole eligibility, whether Applicant relied on misadvise on parole

eligibility when agreeing to plead guilty, and whether Applicant involuntarily pled guilty. The trial

court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 31, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Moussazadeh
361 S.W.3d 684 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harris, Shoshawnee Warr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-shoshawnee-warr-texcrimapp-2021.