Harris Schwartzberg Trust v. Bell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harris Schwartzberg Trust v. Bell

103 So. 3d 926, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19295, 2012 WL 5415670

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 7, 2012·No. No. 2D11-3613·Published

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

The appellants, various named trust defendants in the underlying nursing home litigation, seek review of a nonfinal order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The facts and posture of this case are indistinguishable from those in Schwartzberg v. Knobloch, 98 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). For the reasons set forth therein, we conclude that Eva Bell, as personal representative of the estate of Eugene McNeal, did not prove a basis for long-arm jurisdiction over the [927]*927trust defendants under section 48.193, Florida Statutes (2009).

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS and VILLANTI, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

The appellants, various named trust defendants in the underlying nursing home litigation, seek review of a nonfinal order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The facts and posture of this case are indistinguishable from those in Schwartzberg v. Knobloch, 98 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). For the reasons set forth therein, we conclude that Eva Bell, as personal representative of the estate of Eugene McNeal, did not prove a basis for long-arm jurisdiction over the [927]*927trust defendants under section 48.193, Florida Statutes (2009).

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS and VILLANTI, JJ„ Concur.

Harris Schwartzberg Trust v. Bell, 103 So. 3d 926, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19295, 2012 WL 5415670 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

103 So. 3d 926 (Harris Schwartzberg Trust v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related