Harris Schwartzberg Trust v. Bell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harris Schwartzberg Trust v. Bell

103 So. 3d 926, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19295, 2012 WL 5415670

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 2012

DocketNo. 2D11-3613

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 3d 926 (Harris Schwartzberg Trust v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris Schwartzberg Trust v. Bell, 103 So. 3d 926, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19295, 2012 WL 5415670 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

The appellants, various named trust defendants in the underlying nursing home litigation, seek review of a nonfinal order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The facts and posture of this case are indistinguishable from those in Schwartzberg v. Knobloch, 98 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). For the reasons set forth therein, we conclude that Eva Bell, as personal representative of the estate of Eugene McNeal, did not prove a basis for long-arm jurisdiction over the [927]*927trust defendants under section 48.193, Florida Statutes (2009).

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS and VILLANTI, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

The appellants, various named trust defendants in the underlying nursing home litigation, seek review of a nonfinal order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The facts and posture of this case are indistinguishable from those in Schwartzberg v. Knobloch, 98 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). For the reasons set forth therein, we conclude that Eva Bell, as personal representative of the estate of Eugene McNeal, did not prove a basis for long-arm jurisdiction over the [927]*927trust defendants under section 48.193, Florida Statutes (2009).

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS and VILLANTI, JJ„ Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 So. 3d 926, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19295, 2012 WL 5415670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-schwartzberg-trust-v-bell-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack