Harris, Jr. v. Social Security Administration

E.D. Oklahoma

Harris, Jr. v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma·Decided September 14, 2023·No. 6:21-cv-00286·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

EARL L. HARRIS, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-21-286-GLJ ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES TO THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE EAJA

Plaintiff Earl L. Harris, Jr. was the prevailing party in this action under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,595.90, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) [Docket No. 21]. The Commissioner has no objection [Docket No. 23]. Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that the requested amount is reasonable and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay it to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.]”); see also Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) (“The EAJA therefore permits attorney’s fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper application, and not to their attorneys.”).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Application for Award of Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [Docket No. 21] is hereby granted and that the Government is hereby ordered to pay the above-referenced amount to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the Plaintiff’s attorney is subsequently awarded any fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen,

803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). DATED this 14th day of September, 2023.

______________________________________ GERALD L. JACKSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

EARL L. HARRIS, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-21-286-GLJ ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES TO THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE EAJA

Plaintiff Earl L. Harris, Jr. was the prevailing party in this action under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,595.90, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) [Docket No. 21]. The Commissioner has no objection [Docket No. 23]. Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that the requested amount is reasonable and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay it to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.]”); see also Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) (“The EAJA therefore permits attorney’s fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper application, and not to their attorneys.”).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Application for Award of Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [Docket No. 21] is hereby granted and that the Government is hereby ordered to pay the above-referenced amount to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the Plaintiff’s attorney is subsequently awarded any fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen,

803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). DATED this 14th day of September, 2023.

______________________________________ GERALD L. JACKSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Harris, Jr. v. Social Security Administration, (E.D. Okla. 2023).

Pincite

Harris, Jr. v. Social Security Administration (Harris, Jr. v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related