Harris Equipment Co. v. McGuigan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harris Equipment Co. v. McGuigan

122 S.E.2d 286, 104 Ga. App. 612, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 750

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 11, 1961

Docket39129

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 122 S.E.2d 286 (Harris Equipment Co. v. McGuigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris Equipment Co. v. McGuigan, 122 S.E.2d 286, 104 Ga. App. 612, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 750 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Eberhardt, Judge.

“The sole assignment of error contained in the bill of exceptions in this case is to the judgment of the trial court overruling the demurrer to the defendant’s answer. Under repeated decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court the bill of exceptions is premature and there being no assignment of error on a final judgment the writ of error must be dismissed. Sundy v. Allgood, 93 Ga. App. 741 (92 SE2d 726); Chandler v. Southern Union Conference, 95 Ga. App. 66 (96 SE2d 621); Stowe v. Columbia Loan Co., 95 Ga. App. 634 (98 SE2d 218).” Wade v. Ward, 101 Ga. App. 44 (112 SE2d 689). And see Cox v. Peoples Fin. Serv., 101 Ga. App. 506 (114 SE2d 293); Etheridge v. Quality Hatchery, 98 Ga. App. 164 (105 SE2d 402); Shaw v. Miller, 214 Ga. 225 (104 SE2d 128); Beavers v. Williams, 197 Ga. 9 (28 SE2d 254); Rivers v. Hollingsworth, 196 Ga. 708 (27 SE2d 330); Darden v. Roberts, 193 Ga. 637 (19 SE2d 270).

Dismissed.

Carlisle, P. J., and Nichols, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eberhardt, Judge.

“The sole assignment of error contained in the bill of exceptions in this case is to the judgment of the trial court overruling the demurrer to the defendant’s answer. Under repeated decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court the bill of exceptions is premature and there being no assignment of error on a final judgment the writ of error must be dismissed. Sundy v. Allgood, 93 Ga. App. 741 (92 SE2d 726); Chandler v. Southern Union Conference, 95 Ga. App. 66 (96 SE2d 621); Stowe v. Columbia Loan Co., 95 Ga. App. 634 (98 SE2d 218).” Wade v. Ward, 101 Ga. App. 44 (112 SE2d 689). And see Cox v. Peoples Fin. Serv., 101 Ga. App. 506 (114 SE2d 293); Etheridge v. Quality Hatchery, 98 Ga. App. 164 (105 SE2d 402); Shaw v. Miller, 214 Ga. 225 (104 SE2d 128); Beavers v. Williams, 197 Ga. 9 (28 SE2d 254); Rivers v. Hollingsworth, 196 Ga. 708 (27 SE2d 330); Darden v. Roberts, 193 Ga. 637 (19 SE2d 270).

Dismissed.

Carlisle, P. J., and Nichols, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.E.2d 286, 104 Ga. App. 612, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-equipment-co-v-mcguigan-gactapp-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack