Harris, D. v. Burgmann, D., Pets.
This text of Harris, D. v. Burgmann, D., Pets. (Harris, D. v. Burgmann, D., Pets.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
DAVID HARRIS AND STEVEN : No. 275 EAL 2023 THOMPSON, : : Respondents : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court v. : : : SEPTA POLICE DETECTIVE DANIEL : BURGMANN, SEPTA POLICE DETECTIVE : STEWART, SEPTA POLICE DETECTIVE : BACON, AND SEPTA POLICE DETECTIVE : BRYAN MCCAULEY, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harris, D. v. Burgmann, D., Pets., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-d-v-burgmann-d-pets-pa-2024.