Harris, D., Pet v. City of Pittsburgh
This text of Harris, D., Pet v. City of Pittsburgh (Harris, D., Pet v. City of Pittsburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
DARLENE HARRIS, : No. 31 WAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : CITY OF PITTSBURGH, WILLIAM : PEDUTO AND CITY OF PITTSBURGH : ETHICS HEARING BOARD, : : Respondents :
DARLENE HARRIS, : No. 32 WAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : CITY OF PITTSBURGH, WILLIAM : PEDUTO AND CITY OF PITTSBURGH : ETHICS HEARING BOARD, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harris, D., Pet v. City of Pittsburgh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-d-pet-v-city-of-pittsburgh-pa-2022.