Harris County v. Pasadena Refining System, Inc. and Crown Central, LLC
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-13-01067-CV Style: Harris County v Pasadena Refining System, Inc. and Crown Central, LLC Date motion filed*: March 14, 2014 Type of motion: Unopposed second motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: February 10, 2014 Number of prior extensions: 1 Current Due date: March 17, 2014 Date Requested: May 19, 2014
Ordered that motion is:
Granted in part If document is to be filed, document due: May 12, 2014 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s motion is granted in part. Appellant’s brief is ordered filed by no later than May 12, 2014. No further extensions will be granted.
Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: April 1, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris County v. Pasadena Refining System, Inc. and Crown Central, LLC (Harris County v. Pasadena Refining System, Inc. and Crown Central, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.