Harris County v. Charlton

245 S.W. 644

Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 29, 1922·No. No. 3738; Motion No. 5587·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

PIERSON, J.

■ In their motion for rehearing, defendants in error call our attention to the item of $497.52, which the trial court found was wrongfully retained from the county funds by defendant in error Charlton, but which was found by said court to be barred by limitation.

The trial court having found and adjudged that this amount of $497.52 was barred by limitation, it would have been proper for us to have affirmed the judgment of the trial court as to this item also.

We therefore grant the rehearing as to this item, and affirm the judgment of the trial court as to it. In all other respects the motion for rehearing is overruled.

CURETON, O. J., took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PIERSON, J.

The trial court having found and adjudged that this amount of $497.52 was barred by limitation, it would have been proper for us to have affirmed the judgment of the trial court as to this item also.

We therefore grant the rehearing as to this item, and affirm the judgment of the trial court as to it. In all other respects the motion for rehearing is overruled.

CURETON, O. J., took no part in the decision of this case.

Harris County v. Charlton, 245 S.W. 644 (Tex. 1922).

Pincite

245 S.W. 644 (Harris County v. Charlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Hemphill County v. Adams

406 S.W.2d 267 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)

Hunt v. Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2

211 S.W.2d 743 (Texas Supreme Court, 1948)

Tom Green Co. v. Motley Admr.

118 S.W.2d 306 (Texas Supreme Court, 1938)

Motley v. Tom Green County

93 S.W.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)