Harris (Ammar) v. State
This text of Harris (Ammar) v. State (Harris (Ammar) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
AMMAR ASIM FARUQ HARRIS, A/K/A No. 84676 AMMAR ASIMFARUQ HARRIS, Appellant, vs. FILE THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court minute "Order denying Ex Parte Motion For Order to Represent Self and Motion to Withdraw Counsel entered in this action on April 27th, 2022." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge. Because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo u. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
,J
4.
Cadish
2.2-167141 cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Ammar Asirn Farug Harris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OP NEVADA
( 0) I947A 4104.,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harris (Ammar) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-ammar-v-state-nev-2022.