Harris (Ammar) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 2022·No. 84676·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

AMMAR ASIM FARUQ HARRIS, A/K/A No. 84676 AMMAR ASIMFARUQ HARRIS, Appellant,

vs.

FILE

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court minute "Order denying Ex Parte Motion For Order to Represent Self and Motion to Withdraw Counsel entered in this action on April 27th, 2022." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo u. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

,J

4.

Cadish

2.2-167141

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Ammar Asirn Farug Harris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OP NEVADA

( 0) I947A 4104.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris (Ammar) v. State, (Neb. 2022).

Harris (Ammar) v. State (Harris (Ammar) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)