Harris (Ammar) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 10, 2022·No. 85060·Published

Opinion

Supreme Gourt OF Nevapa

(Oy ata SRE

_Real Party in Interest.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

AMMAR ASIM FARUQ HARRIS, No. 85060

Petitioner,

VS. .

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT §

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, = f LL E ER

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK, _ AUG 10 2022

Respondent, ELIZABETIVA. BROWN and CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Mesoperary CLER

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the indictment underlying petitioner’s judgment of conviction.

Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170: Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (writ relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Petitioner has not supplied an appendix with copies of any documentation supporting his petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition’). Further, even assuming that the relief sought here could be properly obtained through a petition for a writ of mandamus, any application for such relief should first be directed to and resolved by the district court. See State v. County of Douglas, 90 Nev. 272, 276-77, 524 P.2d 1271, 1274 (1974) (noting that “this court prefers that such an application

Z2%-VUsOI8

[for writ relief] be addressed to the discretion of the appropriate district court” in the first instance), abrogated on other grounds by Attorney Gen. v.

Gypsum Res., 129 Nev. 23, 33-34, 294 P.3d 404, 410-11 (2013). Accordingly,

we ORDER the petition DENIED. Parraguirre / LL. Maat. 5 J. AVa nl * J. \ . 4 eo Hardesty Stiglich

ec: Ammar Asim Faruq Harris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Supreme Court OF NEVADA

10) 147A eRe

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris (Ammar) v. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2022).

Harris (Ammar) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Harris (Ammar) v. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. List v. County of Douglas
524 P.2d 1271 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1974)
Masto v. Gypsum Resources, LLC
294 P.3d 404 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)