Harriott v. State
792 So. 2d 711, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12485, 2001 WL 1008200
This text of 792 So. 2d 711 (Harriott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harriott v. State, 792 So. 2d 711, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12485, 2001 WL 1008200 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Marvin Ameal Harriott appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence, arguing that the trial court erroneously denied his for-cause challenge of a prospective juror. We agree, and reverse and remand for a new trial. See Hamilton v. State, 547 So.2d 630 (Fla.1989); Brown v. State, 728 So.2d 758, 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brown v. State
728 So. 2d 758 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Hamilton v. State
547 So. 2d 630 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
792 So. 2d 711, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12485, 2001 WL 1008200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harriott-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.