Harrington's Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Harrington's Case

123 A.2d 396, 100 N.H. 243, 1956 N.H. LEXIS 41

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 6, 1956

Docket4510

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 123 A.2d 396 (Harrington's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrington's Case, 123 A.2d 396, 100 N.H. 243, 1956 N.H. LEXIS 41 (N.H. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Kenison, C. J.

The inherent power of the judiciaiy to make reasonable rules for the admission and removal of members of the Bar (Ricker’s Petition, 66 N. H. 207, 211), confirmed by long usage and statute (RSA 311:8), requires that this court should take expeditious action for the protection of the community in cases of professional misconduct. Moore’s Case, 76 N. H. 227, 229. “As occasion arises, appropriate disciplinary measures may be taken for the protection of the public, as well as for the maintenance of public confidence in the bar as a whole.” Welanko’s Case, 99 N. H. 413, 414. The misappropriation or embezzlement of clients’ funds by an attorney demonstrates such lack of common honesty as to clearly justify an attorney’s disbarment. Delano’s Case, 58 N. H. 5. “Money collected by an attorney for his client, while in the hands of the attorney, is the money of the client and not capital for the use of the attorney in his business.” Allen’s Case, 75 N. H. 301, 302. While restitution of the misappropriated funds may be taken into consideration by the Trial Court on the question of sentence, it does not preclude disbarment for the protection of the *245 public. Allen’s Case, supra. The respondent’s conduct is contrary to his oath of office, demonstrates his unfitness to practice as an attorney and calls for his removal from office forthwith. The tendered resignation is refused and the respondent is disbarred as an attorney in this state.

So ordered.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenison, C. J.

The inherent power of the judiciaiy to make reasonable rules for the admission and removal of members of the Bar (Ricker’s Petition, 66 N. H. 207, 211), confirmed by long usage and statute (RSA 311:8), requires that this court should take expeditious action for the protection of the community in cases of professional misconduct. Moore’s Case, 76 N. H. 227, 229. “As occasion arises, appropriate disciplinary measures may be taken for the protection of the public, as well as for the maintenance of public confidence in the bar as a whole.” Welanko’s Case, 99 N. H. 413, 414. The misappropriation or embezzlement of clients’ funds by an attorney demonstrates such lack of common honesty as to clearly justify an attorney’s disbarment. Delano’s Case, 58 N. H. 5. “Money collected by an attorney for his client, while in the hands of the attorney, is the money of the client and not capital for the use of the attorney in his business.” Allen’s Case, 75 N. H. 301, 302. While restitution of the misappropriated funds may be taken into consideration by the Trial Court on the question of sentence, it does not preclude disbarment for the protection of the *245 public. Allen’s Case, supra. The respondent’s conduct is contrary to his oath of office, demonstrates his unfitness to practice as an attorney and calls for his removal from office forthwith. The tendered resignation is refused and the respondent is disbarred as an attorney in this state.

So ordered.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.2d 396, 100 N.H. 243, 1956 N.H. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harringtons-case-nh-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack