Harrington v. Ward

9 Mass. 251
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The action is, indeed, of a new impression. We are all, however, clear in the opinion that it does not lie. No action lies against the sheriff, either for his own default, or for that of his deputy, but at the suit of one to whom the sheriff is bound by the duty of his office.' In relation to a suit pending, whether in the service of the original writ, the execution, or any intermediate process, he is answerable for his neglects to none but the plaintiff or the defendant in such suit. Judgment in this case cannot be rendered for the plaintiff upon the rerdiet.

Judgment arrested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrington v. Ward, 9 Mass. 251 (Mass. 1812).

9 Mass. 251 (Harrington v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Annala v. McLeod
206 P.2d 811 (Montana Supreme Court, 1949)
New England Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Brock
169 N.E. 803 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Clark v. Nickell
79 S.E. 1020 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1913)
McPhee v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
100 P. 174 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Eslava v. Jones
83 Ala. 139 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
State ex rel. Sidener v. White
88 Ind. 587 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
State ex rel. Travellers Insurance v. Harris
89 Ind. 363 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
McArthur v. Pease
46 Barb. 423 (New York Supreme Court, 1866)
Page v. Thompson
43 N.H. 373 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Moulton v. Jose
25 Me. 76 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1845)
Mansfield v. Sumner
47 Mass. 94 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1843)
McGregor v. Town of Walden
14 Vt. 450 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1842)
Woodman v. Jones
8 N.H. 344 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1836)
Eason v. . Petway
18 N.C. 44 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1834)