Harrington v. United States
This text of Harrington v. United States (Harrington v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
VINCENT STERLING HARRINGTON
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 24-2403 (TJK)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM
On August 21, 2024, the Court entered a minute order informing Plaintiff that he needed
to serve Defendant within 90 days from this action’s removal under Federal Rule of Civil Proce-
dure 4 and ordering him to either (1) cause process to be served and file proof of service or (2)
move for an extension of time by November 18, 2024. Plaintiff did neither by October 22, so the
Court entered another minute order directing Plaintiff to do so by November 18. That order ex-
plained that Plaintiff had to comply with the Court’s order “to avoid dismissal of this action.” The
November 18 deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has still not filed proof of service or any motion.
Indeed, Plaintiff has filed nothing on the docket since this case was removed, and the only address
the Court has for Plaintiff appears invalid. See ECF Nos. 6-8. Thus, pursuant to Local Rule 83.23
and the Court’s “inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
or otherwise comply with a court order,” Peterson v. Archstone Communities LLC, 637 F.3d 416,
418 (D.C. Cir. 2011), the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. A separate order will
issue.
/s/ Timothy J. Kelly _____ TIMOTHY J. KELLY United States District Judge Date: November 21, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harrington v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-united-states-dcd-2024.