Harrington v. Tucker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Harrington v. Tucker

134 S.E.2d 625, 261 N.C. 372, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 460

DecidedFebruary 26, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E.2d 625 (Harrington v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrington v. Tucker, 134 S.E.2d 625, 261 N.C. 372, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 460 (N.C. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s assignments of error present no new question of law or point requiring extended discussion. A careful examination of the record and the assignments of error shows that the jury, under application of settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against the defendant. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment are upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s assignments of error present no new question of law or point requiring extended discussion. A careful examination of the record and the assignments of error shows that the jury, under application of settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against the defendant. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment are upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.E.2d 625, 261 N.C. 372, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-tucker-nc-1964.