Harrington v. State of New York Office of Court Administration

464 N.E.2d 477, 62 N.Y.2d 626, 476 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4256
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 3, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum [628]*628opinion of that court (94 AD2d 863). Whatever may have been the pre-enactment deliberations as evidenced in the draft bill, the 1977 amendment as finally adopted does not contain sufficient manifestation of a legislative intent to warrant repudiation of the traditional and long-standing practice that the copy of the trial transcript which is required to be filed with the trial court shall be paid for out of public funds. If, indeed, this was the unarticulated intention, amendment of the statute can make that clear.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrington v. State of New York Office of Court Administration, 464 N.E.2d 477, 62 N.Y.2d 626, 476 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4256 (N.Y. 1984).

464 N.E.2d 477 (Harrington v. State of New York Office of Court Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downs v. Rosenthal Collins Group
2011 IL App (1st) 90970 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2011)
Rubin v. New York State Education Department
210 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)