Harrington v. State of New York Office of Court Administration
This text of 464 N.E.2d 477 (Harrington v. State of New York Office of Court Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum [628]*628opinion of that court (94 AD2d 863). Whatever may have been the pre-enactment deliberations as evidenced in the draft bill, the 1977 amendment as finally adopted does not contain sufficient manifestation of a legislative intent to warrant repudiation of the traditional and long-standing practice that the copy of the trial transcript which is required to be filed with the trial court shall be paid for out of public funds. If, indeed, this was the unarticulated intention, amendment of the statute can make that clear.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 N.E.2d 477, 62 N.Y.2d 626, 476 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-state-of-new-york-office-of-court-administration-ny-1984.