Harrington v. State

614 So. 2d 1221, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3460, 1993 WL 86468
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harrington v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 570 So. 2d 1140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1993·No. No. 92-01023·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all of appellant’s convictions and the sentence for the felony. The state correctly concedes error in appellant’s misdemeanor sentences of community control and the imposition of public defender’s fees. See York v. State, 599 So.2d 199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); In re R.B., 582 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Accordingly, the sentences for the misdemeanors are vacated and the imposition of public defender’s fees is stricken.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing on the misdemeanors.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrington v. State, 614 So. 2d 1221, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3460, 1993 WL 86468 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

614 So. 2d 1221 (Harrington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Interest of RB
582 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
York v. State
599 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)