Harrington v. State

614 So. 2d 1221, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3460, 1993 WL 86468
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 1993
DocketNo. 92-01023
StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 1221 (Harrington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrington v. State, 614 So. 2d 1221, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3460, 1993 WL 86468 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all of appellant’s convictions and the sentence for the felony. The state correctly concedes error in appellant’s misdemeanor sentences of community control and the imposition of public defender’s fees. See York v. State, 599 So.2d 199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); In re R.B., 582 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Accordingly, the sentences for the misdemeanors are vacated and the imposition of public defender’s fees is stricken.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing on the misdemeanors.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Interest of RB
582 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
York v. State
599 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 1221, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3460, 1993 WL 86468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.