Harrington v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Harrington v. State

938 S.W.2d 859, 327 Ark. 673, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 148

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 17, 1997

DocketCR 97-242

StatusPublished

This text of 938 S.W.2d 859 (Harrington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrington v. State, 938 S.W.2d 859, 327 Ark. 673, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 148 (Ark. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Timothy Leo Harrington, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Theresa S. Nazario, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Timothy Leo Harrington, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Theresa S. Nazario, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

938 S.W.2d 859, 327 Ark. 673, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-state-ark-1997.