Harrington v. Luddington
This text of 23 Ind. 542 (Harrington v. Luddington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Trial before justice of the peace, and finding for the plaintiff. New trial granted, without the required notice to the plaintiff being shown by the record to have been given. On the day set for the new trial, the plaintiff by his counsel appeared, and moved to set aside the order granting the new trial. This motion was overruled, and the plaintiff, after having his motion entered upon the record, withdrew from the court. Judgment . was entered for the defendant. An appeal was taken by the plaintiff to the Circuit Court, and without any motion for relief in the Circuit Court from any errors the justice may have committed, and without asking to have proceedings subsequent to the first trial set aside, he proceeded to a trial upon the merits, and was defeated. He then attempted to obtain relief from the action of the [543]*543justice, and upon its refusal appeals to this court. "Whatever errors may have occurred before the justice, and we do not decide that there were any, were waived by the appellant when he submitted, in the Circuit Court, to a trial de novo. He took the case by appeal to the Circuit Court, and sought the benefit of a finding and judgment in that court. He must rest content with its results.
Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Ind. 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-luddington-ind-1864.