Harrington v. Legge
This text of 177 N.W. 865 (Harrington v. Legge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We think it clear from the record that the trial court took a mistaken view as to the real issue between the parties, and that the circuit court was correct in holding that the testimony was clear and positive that there was an agreement between the parties that the defendant was to be operated upon by plaintiff for the hernia, and for the sum of $50 to be paid by defendant personally, and that pursuant to such agreement defendant returned to plaintiff on the Monday morning rather than try to make arrangements with the claim agent of the-railroad company to have the operation performed at its expense. The judgment of the circuit court must therefore stand.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 N.W. 865, 171 Wis. 639, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-legge-wis-1920.