Harrington v. Keystone Mutual Benefit Ass'n

42 A. 523, 190 Pa. 77, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 982
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 20, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 4·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,

The only subject of complaint in this case is the refusal of the court below to take off the judgment of nonsuit.

It is conceded that plaintiff’s policy in the defendant association lapsed and became void, and her membership therein ceased because of her failure to pay regularly called assessments. But [79] her contention is that she was entitled to be reinstated to full membership, etc., under the provisions of the following by-law: “ The executive committee shall have power to reinstate a delinquent member, at any time within a year, upon satisfactory evidence of good health and upon payment of all delinquent premiums: ” By-laws, art. 80, sec. 2.

Conceding, for the purpose of argument, that her application was in time, and that she complied or was ready and willing to fully comply with all the terms and conditions of the by-laws above quoted, it does not follow that the committee was bound to reinstate her to membership in the association. While the by-laws empowered them to grant her request, they were not bound nor could they be compelled to do so. It neither clothed her with any legal or equitable right, nor did it impose any duty or obligation on the association that would enable her, as a delinquent member, to maintain this action.

The learned court was therefore clearly right in refusing to take off the judgment of nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrington v. Keystone Mutual Benefit Ass'n, 42 A. 523, 190 Pa. 77, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 982 (Pa. 1899).

42 A. 523 (Harrington v. Keystone Mutual Benefit Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lane v. . Insurance Company
54 S.E. 854 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
Lane v. Insurance Co.
142 N.C. 55 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)