Harrington v. Hummell, Trustee

116 So. 470, 94 Fla. 1194
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 5, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 116 So. 470 (Harrington v. Hummell, Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrington v. Hummell, Trustee, 116 So. 470, 94 Fla. 1194 (Fla. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

-In this case answer was filed to a bill of complaint presented by the trustees in bankruptcy to effect the marshaling of certain assets of the estate of the bankrupt. An answer was filed and a motion was interposed to strike certain parts of the answer which constituted a collateral attack upon the judgments, orders and proceedings in the bankruptcy court. The motion to strike was granted, from which order appeal was taken.

*1195 The order of the chancellor should be affirmed upon authority of the opinion in the case of Hull et al. v. Burr et al., 64 Fla. 83, 59 Sou. 787, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrington v. Hummell
129 So. 608 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 470, 94 Fla. 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-hummell-trustee-fla-1928.