Harrington v. Hummell, Trustee

116 So. 470, 94 Fla. 1194
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 5, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

-In this case answer was filed to a bill of complaint presented by the trustees in bankruptcy to effect the marshaling of certain assets of the estate of the bankrupt. An answer was filed and a motion was interposed to strike certain parts of the answer which constituted a collateral attack upon the judgments, orders and proceedings in the bankruptcy court. The motion to strike was granted, from which order appeal was taken.

*1195 The order of the chancellor should be affirmed upon authority of the opinion in the case of Hull et al. v. Burr et al., 64 Fla. 83, 59 Sou. 787, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrington v. Hummell, Trustee, 116 So. 470, 94 Fla. 1194 (Fla. 1928).

116 So. 470 (Harrington v. Hummell, Trustee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrington v. Hummell
129 So. 608 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)