Harrington v. Harrington

16 S.W. 538, 4 Willson 119
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 19, 1890·No. No. 6438·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

[120]*120April 19, 1890.

§ 80. Citation; service of; after return day thereof, a nullity. Judgment by default was rendered in favor of defendant in error against plaintiff in error in the county court, upon a promissory note for $307.15 and interest thereon and costs. Said judgment is erroneous because the defendant in the suit was not cited to appear and answer in thq suit in the manner provided by law. A citation was issued March ,29, 1S88, returnable on the first Monday in April, 1888, and this, citation was served upon the defendant June 25, 1888, and the judgment by default was rendered July 6, 1888. Service of a citation after the return day thereof is a nullity, and will not authorize a judgment by default. [E. S., art. 1228; 3 Civil Cas. Ot. App., § 314.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrington v. Harrington, 16 S.W. 538, 4 Willson 119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1890).

16 S.W. 538 (Harrington v. Harrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lemothe v. Cimbalista by Gates
236 S.W.2d 681 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1951)
Harrison v. Whiteley
6 S.W.2d 89 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1928)
Mitchell v. Reitz
269 S.W. 279 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Blanton Banking Co. v. Taliaferro
262 S.W. 196 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Sparkman v. Sparkman
209 S.W. 252 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)