Harrington v. Hadden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harrington v. Hadden

132 S.E. 142, 35 Ga. App. 111, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 573

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 25, 1926·No. 16217·Published

Opinion

Stephens, J.

It does not appear that, upon the hearing of the motion for continuance upon the ground of absent witnesses, any showing was made that the motion was not made for the purpose of delay, although the showing in all other respects may have been complete. Aiken v. Carmichael, 127 Ga. 407 (56 S. E. 440). The evidence authorized the verdict for the plaintiff, including the amount found as interest.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenloims, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

It does not appear that, upon the hearing of the motion for continuance upon the ground of absent witnesses, any showing was made that the motion was not made for the purpose of delay, although the showing in all other respects may have been complete. Aiken v. Carmichael, 127 Ga. 407 (56 S. E. 440). The evidence authorized the verdict for the plaintiff, including the amount found as interest.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenloims, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Harrington v. Hadden, 132 S.E. 142, 35 Ga. App. 111, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

132 S.E. 142 (Harrington v. Hadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related