Harrington v. Hadden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harrington v. Hadden

132 S.E. 142, 35 Ga. App. 111, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 573

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 25, 1926

Docket16217

StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 142 (Harrington v. Hadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrington v. Hadden, 132 S.E. 142, 35 Ga. App. 111, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

It does not appear that, upon the hearing of the motion for continuance upon the ground of absent witnesses, any showing was made that the motion was not made for the purpose of delay, although the showing in all other respects may have been complete. Aiken v. Carmichael, 127 Ga. 407 (56 S. E. 440). The evidence authorized the verdict for the plaintiff, including the amount found as interest.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenloims, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

It does not appear that, upon the hearing of the motion for continuance upon the ground of absent witnesses, any showing was made that the motion was not made for the purpose of delay, although the showing in all other respects may have been complete. Aiken v. Carmichael, 127 Ga. 407 (56 S. E. 440). The evidence authorized the verdict for the plaintiff, including the amount found as interest.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenloims, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.E. 142, 35 Ga. App. 111, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-hadden-gactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack