Harrington v. Greidanus

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Harrington v. Greidanus

157 A. 384, 9 N.J. Misc. 1340, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 39

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedDecember 8, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 157 A. 384 (Harrington v. Greidanus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrington v. Greidanus, 157 A. 384, 9 N.J. Misc. 1340, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 39 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Rule 141 of this court provides that on all appeals taken the statement of the case submitted to the court shall include,, among other matters, the record of the case. It hardly seems necessary to state that a judgment which is sought to be reviewed must appear as a part of that record. An examination of the statement of the case submitted to the court on this appeal fails to disclose that any judgment was ever-entered in the Circuit Court. Unless the record of the alleged judgment is included in the statement of the case submitted upon the appeal, the court cannot either affirm or reverse it,, for there is nothing before the court to review. Thompson v. Browne, 39 N. J. L. 2; Mershon v. Castru, 57 Id. 484; Stagway v. Riker, 88 Atl. Rep. 1067.

For the reason indicated, the appeal will be dismissed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Rule 141 of this court provides that on all appeals taken the statement of the case submitted to the court shall include,, among other matters, the record of the case. It hardly seems necessary to state that a judgment which is sought to be reviewed must appear as a part of that record. An examination of the statement of the case submitted to the court on this appeal fails to disclose that any judgment was ever-entered in the Circuit Court. Unless the record of the alleged judgment is included in the statement of the case submitted upon the appeal, the court cannot either affirm or reverse it,, for there is nothing before the court to review. Thompson v. Browne, 39 N. J. L. 2; Mershon v. Castru, 57 Id. 484; Stagway v. Riker, 88 Atl. Rep. 1067.

For the reason indicated, the appeal will be dismissed

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A. 384, 9 N.J. Misc. 1340, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-greidanus-nj-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack