Harrington v. Gideon

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Harrington v. Gideon

50 S.E. 549, 71 S.C. 16, 1905 S.C. LEXIS 7

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 6, 1905·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Watts granting a motion to strike out certain allegations of the complaint. The question presented and the facts of the case are exactly the same as in the case of Rudolph H. Weiters v. J. A. May et al., recently decided by this Court. For the reasons stated in that case, the order appealed from in this case should be reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out, but in so far as the said order granted an extension of time to defendant in which to plead, answer or demur, it should be affirmed:

The judgment of the Circuit Court is, therefore, reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Watts granting a motion to strike out certain allegations of the complaint. The question presented and the facts of the case are exactly the same as in the case of Rudolph H. Weiters v. J. A. May et al., recently decided by this Court. For the reasons stated in that case, the order appealed from in this case should be reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out, but in so far as the said order granted an extension of time to defendant in which to plead, answer or demur, it should be affirmed:

The judgment of the Circuit Court is, therefore, reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out.

Harrington v. Gideon, 50 S.E. 549, 71 S.C. 16, 1905 S.C. LEXIS 7 (S.C. 1905).

Pincite

50 S.E. 549 (Harrington v. Gideon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.