Harrington v. Gideon

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Harrington v. Gideon

50 S.E. 549, 71 S.C. 16, 1905 S.C. LEXIS 7

DecidedMarch 6, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 50 S.E. 549 (Harrington v. Gideon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrington v. Gideon, 50 S.E. 549, 71 S.C. 16, 1905 S.C. LEXIS 7 (S.C. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Watts granting a motion to strike out certain allegations of the complaint. The question presented and the facts of the case are exactly the same as in the case of Rudolph H. Weiters v. J. A. May et al., recently decided by this Court. For the reasons stated in that case, the order appealed from in this case should be reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out, but in so far as the said order granted an extension of time to defendant in which to plead, answer or demur, it should be affirmed:

The judgment of the Circuit Court is, therefore, reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Watts granting a motion to strike out certain allegations of the complaint. The question presented and the facts of the case are exactly the same as in the case of Rudolph H. Weiters v. J. A. May et al., recently decided by this Court. For the reasons stated in that case, the order appealed from in this case should be reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out, but in so far as the said order granted an extension of time to defendant in which to plead, answer or demur, it should be affirmed:

The judgment of the Circuit Court is, therefore, reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 S.E. 549, 71 S.C. 16, 1905 S.C. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-gideon-sc-1905.