Harrington v. Florence Oil Co.

35 A. 855, 178 Pa. 444, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1190
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 11, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 74·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

For reasons given by the learned master, whose findings of fact and conclusions of law appear to have been approved by the court below, we are satisfied there is no error in this decree. The questions involved have been so satisfactorily disposed of that neither of them requires further discussion. Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrington v. Florence Oil Co., 35 A. 855, 178 Pa. 444, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1190 (Pa. 1896).

35 A. 855 (Harrington v. Florence Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faust v. Heckler
58 A.2d 147 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Beaver v. Slane
114 A. 509 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Rinaker v. Dollar Savings Fund & Trust Co.
69 A. 43 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Dorff v. Schmunk
47 A. 113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)