Harrington v. Fall River Iron Works Co.
This text of 119 Mass. 82 (Harrington v. Fall River Iron Works Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If, as the jury have found under the instructions of the court, the plaintiff was kept from his work by sickness, and gave reasonable notice thereof to the defendant, and was absent only so long as he was so disabled, his absence was not wilful or intentional, and did not forfeit his right to his wages, either under the contract of the parties, or by the general rules of law. Naylor v. Fall River Iron Works, 118 Mass. 317. Noon v. Salisbury Mills, 3 Allen, 340. Fuller v. Brown, 11 Met. 440. Caden v. Farwell, 98 Mass. 137. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 Mass. 82, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-fall-river-iron-works-co-mass-1875.