Harrington v. Castaldo
This text of 209 A.D.2d 945 (Harrington v. Castaldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion in action No. 2 for an injunction pursuant to First Natl. Stores v Yellowstone Shopping Ctr. (21 NY2d 630, rearg denied 22 NY2d 827). Plaintiff met the criteria set forth in Stuart v D & D Assocs. (160 AD2d 547, 548). We modify the order appealed from, therefore, by granting plaintiff’s motion. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J.—Preliminary Injunction.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Wesley and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D.2d 945, 619 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-castaldo-nyappdiv-1994.