Harrington v. Blackston

473 S.E.2d 47, 322 S.C. 470, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 225
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 6, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 473 S.E.2d 47 (Harrington v. Blackston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrington v. Blackston, 473 S.E.2d 47, 322 S.C. 470, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 225 (S.C. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in this Court. Prior to the Court acting on the petition, the parties submitted a consent order of settlement and a settlement agreement to the Court for its approval. The consent order of settlement and settlement agreement are hereby approved and the opinion of the Court of Appeals in Harrington v. Blackston, — S.C. —, 459 S.E. (2d) 309 (Ct. App. 1995) is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED. _

/s/ Ernest A. Finney. Jr.. C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal. J.

/s/ James E. Moore. J.

Is/ John H. Waller. Jr.. J.

Burnett, Justice:

While I agree that the consent order of settlement and settlement agreement should be approved, I disagree with the majority’s decision to vacate the Court of Appeals’ opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Madowitz v. WOODS AT KILLINGTON OWNERS
2010 VT 37 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2010)
Penny Creek Associates, LLC v. Fenwick Tarragon Apartments, LLC
651 S.E.2d 617 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 S.E.2d 47, 322 S.C. 470, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-blackston-sc-1996.