Harrington v. Barnett Bank of Tampa
This text of 689 So. 2d 1169 (Harrington v. Barnett Bank of Tampa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Marie Harrington, as personal representative of her mother’s estate, appeals an order that dismissed her complaint against Barnett Bank of Tampa for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Although the trial court erred by applying Florida law to dismiss Harrington’s cause of action, we conclude that the claim would be barred even under Delaware’s version of the impact rule. See Mancino v. Webb, 274 A.2d 711 (Del.Super.1971). Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 So. 2d 1169, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1823, 1997 WL 91366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-barnett-bank-of-tampa-fladistctapp-1997.