Harrington v. American Woman's Realty Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Harrington v. American Woman's Realty Co.

182 Misc. 110, 49 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2136

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 182 Misc. 110 (Harrington v. American Woman's Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrington v. American Woman's Realty Co., 182 Misc. 110, 49 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

.The first, second and fourth defenses are legally insufficient. (Zwang v. A. & P. Food Stores, 181 Misc. 375; Bowles v. American Stores, 139 F. 2d 377.) The third defense is not a complete defense, but may be a partial defense to plaintiff’s claim for cumulative damages. (Ward v. Bochino, 181 Misc. 355.)

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted with leave to serve an amended answer within five days after service of order entered hereon upon payment of costs.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI