HARRINGTON, BRENDA C. v. BRUNSON, MARY A.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in HARRINGTON, BRENDA C. v. BRUNSON, MARY A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.3d 1581
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 19, 2015·No. CA 14-01660·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

425 CA 14-01660 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

BRENDA C. HARRINGTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

MARY A. BRUNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

FORSYTH, HOWE, O’DWYER, KALB & MURPHY, P.C., ROCHESTER (SANFORD R. SHAPIRO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK, PLLC, PITTSFORD (ROBERT D. SCHULTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered January 10, 2014. The order granted in part and denied in part the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: June 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRINGTON, BRENDA C. v. BRUNSON, MARY A., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

HARRINGTON, BRENDA C. v. BRUNSON, MARY A. (HARRINGTON, BRENDA C. v. BRUNSON, MARY A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)