Harriman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harriman v. State

366 So. 2d 1259, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1979·No. No. LL-97·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence for burglary are affirmed. However, the cause is remanded to correct the erroneous sentence set forth in the “Uniform Commitment to Custody of Division of Corrections” which fails to specify credit for jail time previously served. Duncan v. State, 354 So.2d 451 (Fla.1st DCA 1978). Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence for burglary are affirmed. However, the cause is remanded to correct the erroneous sentence set forth in the “Uniform Commitment to Custody of Division of Corrections” which fails to specify credit for jail time previously served. Duncan v. State, 354 So.2d 451 (Fla.1st DCA 1978). Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Harriman v. State, 366 So. 2d 1259, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

366 So. 2d 1259 (Harriman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related