Harrigan v. Friend

237 A.D.2d 976, 656 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3601

This text of 237 A.D.2d 976 (Harrigan v. Friend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrigan v. Friend, 237 A.D.2d 976, 656 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law {see, Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 11, 29 [6]). Defendants failed to establish as a matter of law that plaintiff was in the special employ of defendant Video-seal Corp. at the time of her accident (see, Kinney v Kuhn, 122 AD2d 569, 570; see generally, Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557-558). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Rath, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.
585 N.E.2d 355 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Kinney v. Kuhn
122 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D.2d 976, 656 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrigan-v-friend-nyappdiv-1997.