Harrigan v. City of New York

S.D. New York

Harrigan v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 4, 2022·No. 1:19-cv-03489·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Sonnac nnnnns IK DATE FILED:_04/04/2022 JAHUMI HARRIGAN, : Plaintiff, : : 19-cv-3489 (LJL) -V- : : ORDER THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., : Defendants. :

nnn K LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Jahumi Harrigan is hereby ORDERED, by June 3, 2022, to file a letter on the docket explaining why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or for failure to state a claim in response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 80. Plaintiff is hereby notified that failure to respond may result in dismissal. See Lewis v. Rawson, 564 F.3d 569, 576 (2d Cir. 2009). Plaintiff is advised that there is a legal clinic in this district that provides assistance, free of charge, to people who are parties in civil cases and do not have lawyers. The clinic is run by a private organization called the New York Legal Assistance Group (““NYLAG’”); it is not part of, or run by, the Court. An unrepresented party can contact NYLAG via https://nylag.org/gethelp/ or by calling (212) 659-6190. The Clerk of Court is directed to lift the stay which was granted on July 2, 2020, Dkt. No. 73, in response to Plaintiffs request for a stay of litigation for thirty (30) days so that Plaintiff could obtain other counsel, Dkt. No. 70. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. SO ORDERED.

ve on Dated: April 4, 2022 Ke New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Sonnac nnnnns IK DATE FILED:_04/04/2022 JAHUMI HARRIGAN, : Plaintiff, : : 19-cv-3489 (LJL) -V- : : ORDER THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., : Defendants. :

nnn K LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Jahumi Harrigan is hereby ORDERED, by June 3, 2022, to file a letter on the docket explaining why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or for failure to state a claim in response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 80. Plaintiff is hereby notified that failure to respond may result in dismissal. See Lewis v. Rawson, 564 F.3d 569, 576 (2d Cir. 2009). Plaintiff is advised that there is a legal clinic in this district that provides assistance, free of charge, to people who are parties in civil cases and do not have lawyers. The clinic is run by a private organization called the New York Legal Assistance Group (““NYLAG’”); it is not part of, or run by, the Court. An unrepresented party can contact NYLAG via https://nylag.org/gethelp/ or by calling (212) 659-6190. The Clerk of Court is directed to lift the stay which was granted on July 2, 2020, Dkt. No. 73, in response to Plaintiffs request for a stay of litigation for thirty (30) days so that Plaintiff could obtain other counsel, Dkt. No. 70. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. SO ORDERED.

ve on Dated: April 4, 2022 Ke New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Harrigan v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Harrigan v. City of New York (Harrigan v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related