Harrig v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

6 F. App'x 645
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2001·No. No. 00-70639; R.R.B. No. WA-506-24-9369·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Jo Ann Harrig petitions pro se for review of the Railroad Retirement Board’s (“RRB”) decision, affirming the hearing officer’s computation of her widow’s annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 45 U.S.C. § 231.

We will not set aside a decision of the RRB “if it is supported by substantial evidence, is not arbitrary and has a reasonable basis in law.” Calderon v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 780 F.2d 812, 813 (9th Cir.1986) (citation omitted).

We have reviewed the record and the RRB’s decision and conclude that it is [646] supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrig v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 6 F. App'x 645 (9th Cir. 2001).

6 F. App'x 645 (Harrig v. United States Railroad Retirement Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related