Harries v. Norris
This text of 6 La. App. 156 (Harries v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff sues for $137.00 as the balance due on a contract for painting defendant’s house.
Defendant resists payment upon the ground that the work was poorly done, necessitating the employment of another painter to finish the work.
The evidence, effective in plaintiff’s favor, at least equals the effect of the countervailing testimony adduced by defendant. Under the circumstances the judgment appealed from must be and it is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 La. App. 156, 1927 La. App. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harries-v-norris-lactapp-1927.